Unbreakable theory of evolution

Based on experience during a response to a problem the theory of evolution, generally creationist theory of evolution always brings and quoting Harun Yahya. They do not care if HY not an expert in the field of biology, and did not have competence in that field.

This particular thread to respond to the work of HY, 'the collapse of the theory of evolution in 20 questions', which can be fairly basic. So things beyond the possibilities are discussed.

From the first introduction

The theory of evolution 150 years old, and also had a profound effect on the view adopted community life. This theory stated a falsehood, namely that human beings came into this world as a result of chance, and that man is an animal species ?? ??.

1. The theory of evolution is a scientific theory

quote :

The theory of evolution states that living things on earth are created as a result of chance and emerged by itself from natural conditions. This theory is not a scientific law or a proven fact. Behind the mask of scientific, this theory is a materialist view of life crammed into society by Darwinists. The basics of this theory - which has been invalidated by the scientific evidence in all areas - are ways of influence and propaganda, consisting of deceptions, falsehood, contradiction, cheating, and the illusion of legerdemain.

The theory of evolution does not talk about the origin of the creation of living beings, much less by chance. Which discusses the theory of origin of life is the modern theory of abiogenesis. Funny if it wanted to refute the theory of evolution, but did not know different theory of evolution (the origin of species) with the modern theory of abiogenesis (origin of life). The theory of evolution is not a materialist propaganda. If for not talking about God's role in it then claimed materialist propaganda, then all scientific tori materialist propaganda must also be considered as well. And again, there is no 'scientific proof' that the theory of evolution. Instead, it posts HY unscientific, is full of lies and propaganda and engineering.

quote : 

The theory of evolution presented as imaginary hypothesis in the context of scientific understanding of the nineteenth century are still underdeveloped, which to this day has never been supported by experiments or scientific discoveries whatsoever. Instead, all methods that aims to prove the validity of this theory actually end up with proof of invalidity.

It is true that the theory of evolution was initiated in the 19th century, which is relatively less than the present. But the many theories and scientific discoveries generated even older. And the theory proved wrong will be aborted, while the theory is proven will to survive, and growing with the progress of knowledge. The theory of evolution can survive and growing as they are now through the same process.

Moreover, if there is no proof, then the theory can not even called a theory, just a hypothesis. The theory is a hypothesis that has been tested. This is one reason why creationism is not even a theory.

quote :

However, even now, there are still many people assume that evolution is a fact that has been proven true - like gravity or the law of floating objects. Because, as has been stated earlier, the theory of evolution actually very different from that received by the community over the years. Therefore, in general, people do not know how bad a stepping stone to this theory; how this theory has been thwarted by scientific evidence at every step; and how evolutionists continue to turn the theory of evolution, although this theory has been "facing death". Evolutionists rely on unproven hypothesis, observation prejudiced and do not match reality, images of imaginary, in ways that can affect psychological, lie countless, as well as the techniques of magic.

Precisely, the theory of evolution is very different from the one propagated HY. And there is no scientific evidence to blow it. Engineering diquote everything above it is propaganda HY

Now, the various branches of science such as paleontology (the branch of geology that examines the lives of pre-history through fossils - trans.), Genetics, biochemistry and molecular biology have proved that there might be living beings created by chance or appear by itself from natural conditions. Living cells, so the scientific world agrees, is the most complex structure ever invented by man. Modern science has revealed that just one living cell has a structure and a variety of complex and interrelated systems, which are far more complex than a large city. Such a complex structure can only function if each of its constituent parts appear simultaneously and in a fully functioning state. Otherwise, the structure will not be useful, and the longer will be damaged and destroyed. There's no way all the parts making up the cell was grown by chance in a million years, such as the theory of evolution. For that reason, the complex design of a single cell, has clearly demonstrated that it is God who creates living beings. (More detailed explanations can be read in the book of Harun Yahya, Miracle in the Cell). [Quote]

Reversed. Precisely paleontology is a strong supporter of the theory of evolution, as well as genetics and molecular biology. The more recent fossil findings increasingly helping scientists understand the evolution of living things, including "transitional fossils" reptile-bird for example. Dna comparison test is one way scientists to know when two separate species in their evolution.

Again, the theory of evolution does not talk about how living things were created. And evidence shows how living things evolve gradually. Complexity is a prove supernatural intervention and does not occur naturally impossible to prove something.

[quote] However, the defenders of materialist philosophy is not willing to accept the fact of creation as diverse ideological reasons. This is due to the emergence and development of the people living in the warmth of noble character who taught the true religion for mankind through God's commands and prohibitions are not the expectations of the materialists this. People who grew up without moral and spiritual values ​​are preferred among these, because they can manipulate such a society for the benefit of their own worldly. That is why, the materialists try to continue to impose the theory of evolution - which contains a lie that man was not created, but appeared on factors chance and evolved from animals - and, by all means, try to defend the theory of evolution in order to stay alive. The materialists abandon common sense and reason, as well as maintain this nonsense at every opportunity, even though the scientific evidence clearly had destroyed the theory of evolution and confirms the fact of creation.

The theory of evolution is not a philosophical view, had nothing to do with materialism or the like. Whether God exists or not, it is not a discussion of the theory of evolution. And once again, there is no scientific evidence that refutes the theory of evolution.

In fact has been proved that it is impossible if the first living cell - or even a single one of the millions of protein molecules in the cell - can appear on coincidence. This is not only demonstrated through a variety of experiments and observations, but also through mathematical probability calculations. In other words, the evolution of the fall in the first step: that in explaining the emergence of the first living cell.

The emergence of the first living creature is not discussion of the theory of evolution, but the theory abiogeneis. HY even fail in the first objection, because it does not know the difference between the two.

Cell, the smallest unit of living things, could not have arisen by chance under primitive conditions without restraint at a time when the Earth was young - such as forced evolutionists to us to believe. Let alone in such circumstances, in the most advanced laboratories in this century once did, it was impossible. Amino acids, the building blocks of proteins making up the living cell, unable by itself to form organelles inside the cells such as the mitochondria, ribosomes, cell membranes, or the endoplasmic reticulum - let alone forming an intact cell. Therefore, the statement that the first cell formed by chance through a process of evolution, only the custom that is entirely based on imagination.

The living cell, which still contains many secrets, is one of the many major difficulties facing the theory of evolution.

Even early living beings formed abiogenesis did not have the same structure as simple selpaling known now.

Other worrisome dilemma (from the standpoint of evolutionists) is a DNA molecule found in the nucleus of a living cell, a code system consisting of 3.5 billion units containing all the details of living things. DNA was first discovered by X-ray crystallography in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and is a giant molecule with extraordinary design. For many years, Francis Crick, Nobel Prize winner, believes the theory of molecular evolution. But in the end, he himself had to admit that such a complex molecule could not have emerged by itself suddenly due to chance, as the result of an evolutionary process:

RNA world hypothesis talk that the possibility of early living creatures do not have DNA, but which could replace dna rna menjalankansebagian functions. And once again, the discussion of the theory of abiogenesis